Are distinctions like these just legalism?
The short answer
No. Treating an ectopic pregnancy, where the fetus cannot survive, differs from removing a viable fetus, which deliberately kills an innocent human; the end never justifies the means. An annulment finds no valid marriage existed. Praying the Divine Mercy Chaplet does not oppose seeking mercy in other ways. Understood, these are reasonable.
Ectopic pregnancy. In an ectopic pregnancy, where conception occurs outside the uterus, the fetus cannot survive. The other procedure you mention removes a viable fetus. This is no hair-splitting: an innocent human being is deliberately killed. The end never justifies the means, even if the mother will die. God may take innocent life, having the right to; we do not.
Annulment. An annulment is the process determining that a valid marriage never took place, leaving the persons free to marry. Without such proof a marriage is ordinarily presumed valid. One cannot be married to two people, and civil divorce cannot dissolve a valid marriage.
The Divine Mercy Chaplet. Praying it is in no way opposed to asking God's mercy in other ways and circumstances.
These are not legalism; they are reasonable once understood. We must beware of false dichotomies and simplistic conclusions about the Church. Through the Church we meet Jesus in the only way anyone can: with humble gratitude.
Continue exploring
- Am I required to have a large family?Q&A
- Are marital relations not supposed to be pleasurable, since they are for reproduction?Q&A
- Aren't pro-life Catholics who support a war being hypocritical?Q&A
- Breastfeeding makes it impossible to read the signs of fertility. What do we do?Q&A
- Can I accept medical treatment that will impair my fertility?Q&A
- Can a Catholic believe the U.S. was justified in dropping atomic bombs on Japan?Q&A